Dr. Dobb's is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them. Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.


Channels ▼
RSS

Design

Virtual Elves: Keebler IM Bots



The Ingredients

Murray dove into the project. "I am the mad scientist behind RecipeBuddie," she says. "This is different than a recipe database wrapped in an IM wrapper because of natural language. This is a writer's territory, and the writing of the script is fun beyond your wildest dreams. You have to anticipate all of the ways that people are going to ask questions." Take the statement "I hate onions." Someone might also write "I don't like onions," or "I abhor onions," or "No onions for me."

"Then you have to come up with an interesting variety of ways to communicate with the consumer. If someone says he doesn't like onions, you can respond, 'I understand. No onions for you. Why don't you try one of these recipes?'"

This response has three distinct parts an acknowledgement, a repetition of the customer's need, and a suggestion. And each of the parts can be said in a variety of ways. For example, an agent must recognize that "hello" is the same thing as "how the heck are you?" and "hi" and "wassup?"

In a way, scripting an agent with BuddyScript is like writing a screenplay in which there are two characters, the user and the interactive agent. The developer determines what words and phrases the agent can understand, and how it should respond.

"We made RecipeBuddie respond to things like, 'I'm sad,' to which she responds, 'How would you like some comfort food?' Or, 'I need to make dinner for my kids,' to which she responds by giving you things that are child-friendly. A recipe database can't do that, because there's nothing inherent in the recipe for a chicken pot pie that says kids are going to like it. We put a layer over top of the recipe database that is the human layer." That layer associates non-ingredient words, such as kosher or picnic, with recipes.

It took Emedia eight weeks to program RecipeBuddie under an aggressive development schedule. About two thousand pieces of dialogue were created. "The dream combination for this kind of project is a strong programmer and a strong writer. You've got words and nothing else. You have to create a strong voice," says Murray. Her team had to create a specific voice for RecipeBuddie. They started with a vaguely Emeril Lagasse-like character, then a prissier Betty Crocker type, before settling on Becky, who seemed the best fit for Keebler's demographic—women, ages twenty-five to fifty-four. "She's suburban and she's got a sense of humor," says Murray.

But women in this age range aren't the only RecipeBuddie users. Certain other demographic groups, it seems, cannot resist asking an ostensibly female bot questions that range from rudely personal to outright harassing. "I sat down with existing bots and typed in everything I could think of," says Murray, who also solicited questions from friends. This prepared Becky to understand the inevitable questions—Will you date me? How old are you? and other more personal queries—so she could politely steer users back to cookery.

The Taste Test

After overcoming the technical hurdles, Murray next had to contend with political obstacles, beginning with AOL, whose IM service is the most widely used on the Internet. AOL must give permission before outside bots can be launched on its network, because "they have to flip a switch to let an unlimited number of messages go to one screen name," says Murray. This is referred to as "provisioning the bot." The hitch is that AOL isn't making any money off the ActiveBuddy bots. To address this, AOL requires a media buy with a buddy launch—such as a RecipeBuddie promotion on AOL's AIM Today splash screen. Neither MSN nor Yahoo requires such a purchase.

"AOL has attempted to come up with their own bot-launching software," says Murray. "They obviously want to make all the money—when these bots are launched, ActiveBuddy gets paid." Still, the three major IM services have so far allowed RecipeBuddie to run on their networks.

"We're using several methods to measure the success of RecipeBuddie," says Jeff Johansen, vice president of marketing for Keebler. "They include the number of users who added RecipeBuddie to their buddy list, the number of message exchanges with RecipeBuddie, the number of recipes viewed, and the number of recipes printed. The number of users who add RecipeBuddie to their buddy list is a good indication of intent to use RecipeBuddie more than once. And we're also using a factor of the number of printed recipes to determine future purchase intent and estimated incremental offline sales. We're thrilled to report that our quarterly estimates were exceeded in the span of just a few weeks after the launch of RecipeBuddie."

RecipeBuddie launched in September 2002. Keebler says it hasn't yet crunched the numbers, but in the test that sold Keebler on the idea of RecipeBuddie, 120,000 total impressions resulted in an impressive 6.5 percent clickthrough rate from a link in ActiveBuddy to an online entry form for a contest on the Cheez-It Web site.

And previous ActiveBuddy agents, too, have generated high expectations. After the Austin Powers agent launched on June 26, 2002, it chalked up almost fifty million messages during more than two million visits in a single month. Consumers interacted with the Austin Powers bot for an average of almost eight minutes each, groovy news indeed for the marketers behind the agent. Clickthrough rates to the movie site were as high as 75 percent, clickthrough rates to Austin Powers Doritos promotional links were better than 7 percent, and more than four thousand users registered at the Doritos site within the first four days of the campaign.

"From the clickthrough numbers we're getting, the program is considered successful," says Murray, who says she learned three important things from creating RecipeBuddie. "First, we're only scratching the surface of what can be done. Users have a desire to engage with [bots] and really dig deep into them. Second, a tightly knit team needs to do it. It's a little like writing a novel. You can work with a couple of people, but you can't just open it up to six people as you're writing. Third, there are a huge number of opportunities to let people put in their own content. We're currently working on a project to let consumer affairs departments package their most commonly asked questions with answers."

As for RecipeBuddie, that falafel recipe was just what I'd been looking for, and it was time to end our chat. "Thanks for everything," I told her.

"You're welcome," she replied. "Are there any other recipes I can find for you today?" But before I could answer, she chirped, "Make your everyday occasion special with the distinctive flavor of Toasteds Crackers!"

It's a special day already.

Get the Message

For online marketers, the rapid growth of real-time communication is creating a rush to advertise on the Web using instant messaging. The numbers are impressive: According to ActiveBuddy, over one hundred million consumers have installed one or more free IM clients. A recent Nielsen NetRatings survey found that more than forty-one million home users, or nearly 40 percent of the Internet surfing population, used at least one of the four major instant messaging applications during May 2002. Instant messaging is also becoming increasingly common in the workplace. Nearly 12.6 million office workers used instant messaging during the same time period, which is 31 percent of the active Internet population at work.

There's an even more important statistic for those trying to reach the lucrative youth market. A survey by AOL subsidiary Digital Market Services found that 70 percent of teens between the ages of twelve and seventeen use instant messaging to send text messages both from their computers and via wireless devices, while an even more impressive 83 percent of teens age eighteen to nineteen use instant messaging.

AOL Instant Messenger is the most popular instant messaging application for home users, with more than twenty-two million unique users, or 21 percent of the total surfing population. During May 2002, MSN Messenger drew nearly 15.7 million Internet users, while Yahoo Messenger attracted 12.4 million. ICQ had nearly 4.4 million.

—GB


Gordon Bass is based in upstate New York and writes about technology for numerous publications. Contact him at [email protected].



Related Reading


More Insights






Currently we allow the following HTML tags in comments:

Single tags

These tags can be used alone and don't need an ending tag.

<br> Defines a single line break

<hr> Defines a horizontal line

Matching tags

These require an ending tag - e.g. <i>italic text</i>

<a> Defines an anchor

<b> Defines bold text

<big> Defines big text

<blockquote> Defines a long quotation

<caption> Defines a table caption

<cite> Defines a citation

<code> Defines computer code text

<em> Defines emphasized text

<fieldset> Defines a border around elements in a form

<h1> This is heading 1

<h2> This is heading 2

<h3> This is heading 3

<h4> This is heading 4

<h5> This is heading 5

<h6> This is heading 6

<i> Defines italic text

<p> Defines a paragraph

<pre> Defines preformatted text

<q> Defines a short quotation

<samp> Defines sample computer code text

<small> Defines small text

<span> Defines a section in a document

<s> Defines strikethrough text

<strike> Defines strikethrough text

<strong> Defines strong text

<sub> Defines subscripted text

<sup> Defines superscripted text

<u> Defines underlined text

Dr. Dobb's encourages readers to engage in spirited, healthy debate, including taking us to task. However, Dr. Dobb's moderates all comments posted to our site, and reserves the right to modify or remove any content that it determines to be derogatory, offensive, inflammatory, vulgar, irrelevant/off-topic, racist or obvious marketing or spam. Dr. Dobb's further reserves the right to disable the profile of any commenter participating in said activities.

 
Disqus Tips To upload an avatar photo, first complete your Disqus profile. | View the list of supported HTML tags you can use to style comments. | Please read our commenting policy.